|
|
|
|
July 12, 2007 The Office of Harassment Prevention |
|
|
Guidelines on the Prevention of Harassment in Hokkaido University |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●1. Aims of the Guidelines
●2. Harassment is strictly forbidden in Hokkaido University
●3. What is harassment?
●4.How to prevent yourself from harassing someone
●5.What to do when you are being subjected to harassment?
●6.What to do if you witness harassment or are asked for help?
●7.Hokkaido University’s system for responding to harassment
●8.Consultation
●9.Investigation and Resolution
●10.Confidentiality and Support for Complainants
●11.Action against harassers
●12.False statements are forbidden
●13.Seminars and Trainings
●14.Revision of guidelines and related regulations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.Aims of the Guidelines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following guidelines provide ways of dealing with harassment for administrators,
faculty, staff, students, and other individuals engaged in any activity
or program at Hokkaido University. They cover the definition of harassment,
the preventive measures to be taken, and the procedures for responding
to and resolving reports of harassment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.Harassment is strictly forbidden in Hokkaido University |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Harassment ruins a person’s dignity and is a serious violation of human
rights. It is strictly forbidden in the University. |
|
|
(2) |
The University determines to make every effort to provide necessary remedies
for those who suffer the ill-effects of harassment, and to take strict
action against those who harass members of the University. Harassers must
reflect deeply on their wrong conduct and may face disciplinary action
up to and including termination of employment or student status. |
|
|
(3) |
The University is committed to taking responsibility for preventing and
responding to the occurrence of harassment in order to create and maintain
a harassment-free environment in education, research, and work. |
|
|
(4) |
It is the responsibility of every administrator, faculty member, staff
member, and student of the University to contribute to preventing harassment
in the University. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.What is harassment? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Harassment” is a term which incorporates the concepts of “bullying” and
“abuse.” Hokkaido University considers that harassment can be both “sexual
harassment” and “academic harassment,” which will be defined in the following
paragraphs. Harassment also includes those incidents occurring outside
the University campus and during out-of-work and out-of-school hours. For
example, it includes remarks and/or behaviors that occur during travel
and on business, professional, or educational trips, and on social occasions
such as welcoming, end-of-year, and farewell parties participated by students
or employees. |
|
|
(1) |
Sexual Harassment |
|
|
|
1) |
Sexual Harassment refers to unwelcome verbal or physical conduct of a sexual
nature which causes discomfort and is harmful to recipients. In determining
whether the reported conduct constitutes sexual harassment, consideration
shall be given to the subsequent effect of such conduct on the recipient
rather than the intent of the accused. |
|
|
|
2) |
There are two types of sexual harassment: the “Hostile environment” type
and the “Quid pro quo” (something for something) type. |
|
|
|
|
1 |
Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment is unwelcome sexual advances and
verbal or physical behavior of a sexual nature which creates a hostile
and intimidating environment and has the effect of interfering with an
individual’s work and academic performance. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment is unwelcome sexual advances or requests
for sexual favors by those taking advantage of a position of authority
(e.g., an academic superior, a supervisory employee or a senior ranking
student) in exchange for work or academic benefits to the recipient, favorably
or detrimentally. |
|
|
|
3) |
Examples of Sexual Harassment |
|
|
|
|
1 |
Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Lewd conversations in offices or laboratories, unwelcome references to
various parts of the body or asking their physical measurements. |
|
|
|
|
|
b. |
Exposing oneself in front of a person of the opposite sex, displaying sexually
suggestive photographs and pictures. |
|
|
|
|
|
c. |
Demanding someone to pour drinks like a waitperson or sing a Karaoke duet
at parties. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Any sexual advances pretending to be a part of educational or managerial
guidance. |
|
|
|
|
|
b. |
Treating someone unfavorably over academic or managerial decisions in exchange
for the refusal of a previous sexual advance. |
|
|
|
4) |
Sexual harassment occurs more often in hierarchical relationships (such
as relations between senior and junior ranking students, a supervisor and
a subordinate, a faculty advisor and his/her student or a TA and a student)
than between peers or colleagues. |
|
|
|
5) |
The most common form of sexual harassment is that of men harassing women,
but the opposite case occurs occasionally. Sexual harassment may also occur
between people of the same sex. |
|
|
|
6) |
Inappropriate remarks and/or behavior of a sexually discriminatory nature
based on the assumption or belief that women are subordinate to men is
also deemed to be sexual harassment. |
|
|
(2) |
Academic Harassment |
|
|
|
1) |
Academic harassment involves relations between people of unequal authority
or status in the University community. It refers to inappropriate remarks
and/or behavior that make use of a position of superiority to limit the
benefits or full participation of work or study of those in a subordinate
position in the University or to harm the recipients’ dignity and self-esteem.
Power harassment is also deemed to be academic harassment.
|
|
|
|
2) |
Examples of Academic Harassment |
|
|
|
|
1 |
Academic harassment in work and research activities |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Arbitrarily limiting access to equipment or facilities of the University
as well as limiting the opportunities for presenting or publishing his/her
work. |
|
|
|
|
|
b. |
Delaying feedback and/or supervision to disrupt daily work |
|
|
|
|
|
c. |
Requiring an amount of daily work which is impossible to complete within
regular working hours. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Academic harassment in teaching and learning |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Limiting instruction and/or supervision which disrupts the normal progress
of a student’s academic standing |
|
|
|
|
|
b. |
Giving an amount of assignments which common sense would dictate to be
impossible to complete |
|
|
|
|
|
c. |
Inappropriate grading and evaluation of student work |
|
|
|
3) |
Academic harassment occurs more often in the relationship between people
of unequal authority or power, such as relations between senior and junior
ranking students, a supervisor and a subordinate or faculty and students,
than between peers or colleagues. |
|
|
|
4) |
Inappropriate remarks and/or behavior based on the discriminatory belief
or assumption that people in lower positions should be subservient to people
in superior positions, or that the numerically superior can ignore the
opinion of the minority, are categorized as academic harassment. |
|
|
|
5) |
The most common form of academic harassment is that of people in superior
positions harassing people in lower positions, but the opposite case also
can occur occasionally by the manipulation of numerical advantage. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.How to prevent yourself from harassing someone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To prevent from harassing someone, it is necessary to recognize the importance
of the following points. |
|
|
(1) |
Respect others and build up a habit of behavior that is sensitive to other
people's feelings and viewpoints. |
|
|
(2) |
Develop an awareness that all of us are equal and are important partners
to each other in society. |
|
|
(3) |
Do not be misled by the assumption that you have a favorable relationship
with the person to whom inappropriate remarks and/or behavior might be
directed. |
|
|
(4) |
The perception of sexual harassment varies from individual to individual
so that the recipient’s feeling is a decisive factor.
For example, remarks and/or behavior intended to show friendship may sometimes
cause discomfort to others. Remarks and/or behavior acceptable to one person
can be considered sexual harassment by another depending on regional and
cultural differences. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.What to do when you are being subjected to harassment? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Take the following action: |
|
|
(1) |
Make it clear to the person causing offence that his/her remarks and/or
behavior are unwelcome or unjust to you when you feel uncomfortable or
find yourself being treated unfairly. If you find this difficult to do,
ask for advice from trusted people such as your friends and colleagues. |
|
|
(2) |
Do not blame yourself or suffer alone. Ask for help from Harassment Prevention
Advisors.
Being harassed is not your fault. |
|
|
(3) |
Take notes of details, for example, the dates and times when you have been
harassed, and the specific remarks and/or the behavior of the person causing
offence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.What to do if you witness harassment or are asked for help? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Take the following action: |
|
|
(1) |
Warn the person causing offense if you witness harassment. If you find
this difficult to do, ask for advice from your friends, colleagues, supervisor,
and others. Your act of kindness may lead to resolving the harassment.
|
|
|
(2) |
Encourage the person to seek advice from Harassment Prevention Advisors
if you are asked for help from friends or colleagues. You can also offer
further help such as accompanying them to see the advisors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.Hokkaido University’s system for responding to harassment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The University handles incidents of harassment through two avenues. The
consultation function is a process wherein Harassment Prevention Advisors
receive inquiries and claims of harassment. The investigation and resolution
function is a process where fact-finding interviews are conducted and then
appropriate corrective measures and disciplinary action will be requested
to the appropriate unit of the University. |
|
|
(2) |
The University offers an explanation of the system and procedures beforehand
to those who report harassment, and makes all kinds of efforts to resolve
the harassment. |
|
|
(3) |
The University helps to clarify the way the complainant chooses to resolve
the harassment, and makes all the efforts to its settlement respecting
his/her wish accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.Consultation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The role of Harassment Prevention Advisors |
|
|
|
1) |
Hokkaido University appoints faculty, staff, and experts from outside the
University as Harassment Prevention Advisors (to be abbreviated as “HPAs”).
As HPAs protect your honor and privacy, do not hesitate to get advice and
help from them. |
|
|
|
2) |
Consultation with HPAs is available for not only those who claim harassment
but also their friends and concerned others on behalf of the complainant.
Consultation is available by phone, regular mail, e-mail and other methods.
Contact an HPA before taking any other actions. |
|
|
|
3) |
The names and contact information of HPAs are listed on the harassment
awareness card, on posters and on the website. |
|
|
|
4) |
Consultation is usually conducted by two HPAs, one of each sex. A complainant
can bring attendants such as friends when visiting HPAs. |
|
|
|
5) |
HPAs write down what is discussed in a consultation session and submit
a written report to the chairperson of the Harassment Prevention Advisors
Committee. Then, if it is necessary, the HPAs may make an inquiry with
the accused harasser. This inquiry is a part of the consultation procedure
and is not a fact-finding interview by the investigative committee. |
|
|
|
6) |
HPAs confirm the written contents with the complainant by repeating them
during the consultation session or at the end of the consultation session. |
|
|
(2) |
The Role of the Harassment Prevention Advisors Committee |
|
|
|
1) |
The chairperson of the Harassment Prevention Advisors Committee (to be
abbreviated as “the HPAs Committee”) reviews the written report submitted
by the HPAs, and judges if it is necessary to immediately set up an investigative
committee. If deemed necessary, the chairperson transfers the report to
the director of the Office of Harassment Prevention (“the Office”) and
requests a fact-finding investigation. |
|
|
|
2) |
The chairperson of the HPAs Committee may aid in resolving the harassment,
if the complainant chooses a peaceful settlement with the accused. |
|
|
|
3) |
If the chairperson of the HPAs Committee finds it impossible to resolve
the harassment with the assistance of HPAs after reviewing the results
of the inquiry with the accused harasser, he/she may, with the complainant’s
consent, report the case to the director of the Office with the request
of a fact-finding investigation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.Investigation and Resolution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The Role of the Office of Harassment Prevention (“the Office”) |
|
|
|
1) |
Upon the request by the chairperson of the HPAs Committee, the director
of the Office sets up an investigative committee in the Office and conducts
a fact-finding interview.
|
|
|
|
2) |
The director shall take immediate action to relieve the sufferer in cooperation
with the deans/directors of the units involved, if it is found to be necessary,
while the investigation proceeds. |
|
|
|
3) |
The director of the Office informs the sufferer of the start of the investigative
committee and the subsequent results of its investigation including any
remedies that have been made. |
|
|
|
4) |
The director of the Office reports the results of the investigation to
the President of the University and requests the deans/directors of the
units involved to take necessary remedies. |
|
|
(2) |
The Role of the Investigative Committee |
|
|
|
1) |
In order to handle a claim of harassment on a fair and equitable basis
and from an objective perspective, those HPAs who had been consulted by
the sufferers and had made an inquiry into the accused harassers, and those
who have had a special interest in the sufferers or the accused harasser
cannot be chosen as members of the Committee. As soon as it becomes clear
that a member of the Committee has had relations with either party, the
member will be dismissed. |
|
|
|
2) |
In order to guarantee the neutrality and fairness of the Investigative
Committee, its members are chosen from various academic units and in consideration
of the gender ratio. |
|
|
|
3) |
The Committee does not demand the sufferer to prove that the consent did
not exist, even if the accused harasser excuses his/her actions by claiming
consensual conduct. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.Confidentiality and Support for Complainants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Any individuals who handle claims of harassment including HPAs and members
of the Office of Harassment Prevention (“the Office”) must act cautiously
to protect the human rights of the parties involved, including upholding
their honor and privacy. In addition, the release of any information gained
while handling the harassment is strictly forbidden. |
|
|
(2) |
The Office will conduct an investigation of those who, if any, are suspected
of releasing confidential information or are causing the sufferer harm
or secondary damages of harassment. If the facts are found to be true,
the Office will request the President to punish those involved severely. |
|
|
(3) |
If the Office determines that the sufferer needs psychological help, possible
support will be given immediately. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.Action against harassers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the Office substantiates a claim of harassment through a fact-finding
investigation, the Office shall demand the harasser to reflect deeply on
his/her wrongdoing and request the President to take strict measures, including
disciplinary action. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.False statements are forbidden |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Office will demand that those who make false statements and testimonies
to reflect deeply on their conduct and will request the President to punish
them severely. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.Seminars and Trainings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Training for administrators, faculty, staff and students
Hokkaido University makes efforts to prevent harassment by disseminating
the awareness in workshops for employees, orientations for students, and
educational campaigns using newsletters and other publications circulated
internally in the University, that harassment is unacceptable and that
it ruins a person’s dignity and is a serious violation of human rights. |
|
|
(2) |
Training for HPAs.
The University holds workshops for HPAs regularly to make sure that their
consultations be provided from the perspective of sufferers with appropriate
advice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.Revision of guidelines and related regulations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hokkaido University reviews and modifies, if necessary, these guidelines
and related regulations in the continuing efforts of creating and maintaining
a positive campus environment free of harassment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
▲このページの先頭へ |
|